Avoid over-dimensioning a part. Every dimension must have an associated tolerance, and that tolerance must be clearly shown on the drawing. Dimension Guidelines The primary guideline is that of clarity and whenever two guidelines appear to conflict, the method which most clearly communicates the size information shall prevail.

Blender mostly serves artists. They appear to be much neater and easier to read in SW?Answer (1 of 2): Either may be used, but SolidWorks is meant to be a design tool for mechanical parts. 1 - I think by default the constraint icons should be smaller so they don’t pile up on top of each other and you can’t see what they are. ANSI B1.20.1 - NPS - American National Standard Straight Pipe Threads - NPS pressure tight straight pipe threads with lubricant or sealer ANSI B1.20.1 - NPT - American National Standard. Miscellaneous - Engineering related topics like Beaufort Wind Scale, CE-marking, drawing standards and more Threads - Thread data - metric, unified, ACME and others Related Documents. Created by a manufacturer and the user wanted to change the default description.Maybe the sketch environment could be a little tidier?Related Topics.

The dimensions in Catia are set up for standard sheet sizes (tho u can change that manually). Check the scale of your drawing. They are really not fully constrained because the length of both those lines can be changed.1. The desired layer and its display for the dimensions can be set as well using this dialog.2 - In the attached sketch it shows there are 3 dimensions needed even though the lines are now dark blue in color showing they are constrained. Individual property pages will display this style and the user can change this in individually selected dimensions or multiple selected dimensions.

I often use automatic dimension to find where those naughty lines are but an x on the end would be much faster.The sketch environment is the basic backbone of the entier program and it needs to be perfect.Not really the 2014 wishlist but, fix the forum so that when I reply and have to sign in it doesn't reply to the post at the top of the page instead.Looks like lots of votes for 'Fix Stuff Instead!'I say make marketing work. Hey, they will be getting better functionality in current features-maybe they could just ignore that the oversold them to begin with, new users aren't going to know that we've had it for years but it was just crap. Sometimes on complex sketches I spend much time searching for lines that don’t have their ends locked to fully constrain the sketch. Maybe that or something else would be enough to quickly show not locked. I have drawn “ x” marks on those lines to show that. 2.I think there should be a symbol to show those line end points are not locked down.

2013 is 0.0.0 you get the picture.One big thing that I think falls under fixing, but it could be considered new functionality: make everything that looks the same work the same. 0.11.whatever and 2008 becomes 0.12.whatever etc. Or maybe something like, 'Inventor II 1.0'-call the old ones 0.1.whatever. For 2015 come out with a new numbering scheme to reflect that they're starting fresh with what could be considered a new, finished product. I used to work with a salesman who could sell ice to Eskimos - it was up to Engineering to get it to provide light and heat, but he was still getting his commission.I wouldn't mind if they skipped 2014.

Heres the fun part, if I place the segment point somewhere, then select 'redefine' to move that point, I can now place it off of objects that I wasn't able to previously.Another one, is once you are done placing your Tubes/Pipes/Wires/Harnesses, and it comes time to document them, you are unable to place balloons on most of them. It is frustrating as we usually run a bundle of Pneumatic lines and wiring harnesses together, and I am unable to place a harness segment off of any of those, instead I need to place it off of something flat, and then move it where I want it. I know picking on Cable and Harness is like shooting fish in a barrel, but there are a few bigs ones in there such as:When placing segment points you are unable to select certain cylindrical objects, such as other Wires/Harnesses or Tubes/Pipes. Among other things, no more of this 'A cyclical constraint dependency was detected.' if you know what I mean.I could go on and on but I've got to get back to fighting with Inventor.Well besides the few Inventor/Vault bugs I provided, and the one example you provided which I have also ran into, another favorite of mine lies in the Cable and Harness module.

This is a huge weakness in history based modelling and until Inventor Fusion can fully take over all model editing, we desparately need this. It’s bad enough diving into a complex part you have designed yourself, but editing someone else’s work, can be the stuff of very bad nightmares.We really MUST HAVE more aids to learn/trace how a model has been created/designed. Editing that geometry requires the tracking of that history to learn what change will affect what you want to edit and being aware that the editing of those early features can cause inherent problems with other subsequent features.Because you will have a lengthy recipe for creation of even the simplest of parts, to make edits, to reconfigure geometry, to make a design change requires some serious knowledge of how it was designed in the first place. History-based design relies on a linear recipe of features, built on top of features, on top of even more features. An Inventor 3D model is like the Eifel tower in that every leg (2D sketch) below the level you’re on could affect something on your level.

Also, IMHO, the drawing enviroment deserves a lot more attention, its through this medium that most people ever see our designs, in 2D! So here goes. I have many more, but for the drawing area, I think these would go a long way in making my life easier. I did an exercise a while ago where I captured my wishes as I was drawing.

Ironcad Default Dimension Precision